Skip to content

Fix PostCommit Java ValidatesRunner Flink job#38418

Merged
Abacn merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix-metadata
May 8, 2026
Merged

Fix PostCommit Java ValidatesRunner Flink job#38418
Abacn merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix-metadata

Conversation

@Amar3tto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Amar3tto Amar3tto commented May 8, 2026

Fixes #30508
Successful run: https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/25556761935


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@Amar3tto Amar3tto requested a review from damccorm May 8, 2026 17:08
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue with the PostCommit Java ValidatesRunner Flink job by ensuring that metadata support is properly initialized within the relevant test suite. This change ensures that the pipeline correctly handles metadata propagation during execution.

Highlights

  • Metadata Support: Enabled metadata support in the MetadataPropagationTest by calling WindowedValues.WindowedValueCoder.setMetadataSupported().
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the java label May 8, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates MetadataPropagationTest.java to enable metadata support during a test. The review feedback identifies a syntax error in the added line, specifically an incorrect class name and a missing boolean argument, and provides a corrected code suggestion.

@Test
@Category({ValidatesRunner.class, NeedsRunner.class})
public void testMetadataPropagationParameter() {
WindowedValues.WindowedValueCoder.setMetadataSupported();
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The class name should be WindowedValue (singular) and the setMetadataSupported method requires a boolean argument (e.g., true). Additionally, this method is typically called on WindowedValue directly rather than the coder inner class. Note that modifying global static state in a test can lead to side effects in other tests; consider resetting this state after the test execution.

Suggested change
WindowedValues.WindowedValueCoder.setMetadataSupported();
WindowedValue.setMetadataSupported(true);

@Amar3tto Amar3tto requested a review from Abacn May 8, 2026 17:33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Abacn Abacn merged commit e1b3769 into master May 8, 2026
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The PostCommit Java ValidatesRunner Flink job is flaky

2 participants