Skip to content

Update protos and release 0.1.17#31

Open
nl917 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
update-sdk
Open

Update protos and release 0.1.17#31
nl917 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
update-sdk

Conversation

@nl917
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nl917 nl917 commented Apr 3, 2026

  • Update proto to include newest change from benchmarks

@nl917 nl917 changed the title add new generated files Update protos and release 0.1.17 Apr 3, 2026
@nl917 nl917 requested review from andrewmwang and rosbo and removed request for rosbo April 3, 2026 21:34
@nl917 nl917 requested a review from dolaameng April 3, 2026 21:42
@dolaameng dolaameng requested a review from stevemessick April 3, 2026 22:58
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dolaameng dolaameng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you @nl917 !

Would like @stevemessick to take a look.

@nl917 nl917 requested a review from erdalsivri April 6, 2026 18:56
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
__version__ = "0.1.16"
__version__ = "0.1.17"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know the release process of kaggle-sdk but I suppose there is some manual step here to actually publish this package. I don't know how kaggle-cli imports this package. It used be a manual copy but I am not sure if that has changed. @stevemessick knows better

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just realized Steve is OOO this week. Requested review from Jonathan instead

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes @nl917 I think these are experimental features only with placeholder code but not real implementation? Checking in the code is to help unblock downstream application. But if this got published to pypi, we probably just wait till everything is implemented by @andrewmwang first.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jeward414 jeward414 Apr 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also not super familiar with recent implementations/updates to the sdk but I can do a quick look over and see if anything stands out

@nl917 nl917 requested review from jeward414 and removed request for stevemessick April 6, 2026 19:05
The slug for the task without the user's namespace. (ex: my-task instead of
username/my-task). This should match the slug in the kaggle-benchmarks
decorator in the code.
text (str)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrewmwang Can you confirm this the text for the .py source code? And on the server side, a .py file with delimiters like # %% will be converted to a ipython notebook properly?

r"""
Attributes:
task_slugs (ApiBenchmarkTaskSlug)
model_slugs (str)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nl917 @andrewmwang what's the behavior here when model_slugs is empty list []. Will it run on all models, or no models?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants