Migration de la notion de civilité vers la notion de genre#2275
Conversation
Mopolo
force-pushed
the
migration-civilite-vers-genre
branch
4 times, most recently
from
26f31ca to
96827f9
Compare
|
🌈😍 |
| When I follow "My speaker profile" | ||
| Then I should see "Profile picture" | ||
| Then The "speaker[civility]" field should only contain the follow values '["Mr.", "Mrs."]' | ||
| Then The "speaker[genre]" field should only contain the follow values '["Prefer not to say", "Female", "Male", "Nonbinary"]' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thought: I believe the correct translation for this PR would be Woman / Man.
(Female / Male reduces individuals to their reproductive roles / sex attributes)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I wasn't sure about this. I found inspiration from this post: https://www.mathiaspolligkeit.com/inclusive-gender-options-in-web-forms/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You should indeed use "Woman"/"Man"/"Nonbinary" instead. If possible, you may want to let people write their own option. As some people are gender fluid.
What could also be interesting, but definitely for a follow-up might be to allow people to submit their pronouns. Might be less common in France but I have some friends that use "it".
Mopolo
force-pushed
the
migration-civilite-vers-genre
branch
2 times, most recently
from
89ba635 to
b24eb09
Compare
Mopolo
force-pushed
the
migration-civilite-vers-genre
branch
from
b24eb09 to
c649fb4
Compare
4 participants
Les anciennes colonnes
civilitene sont pas supprimées dans cette PR.Je ferais ça dans une autre.