Skip to content

Bump com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 2.19.2 to 2.21.2#3456

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-databind-2.21.2
Open

Bump com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 2.19.2 to 2.21.2#3456
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-databind-2.21.2

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 22, 2026

Bumps com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind from 2.19.2 to 2.21.2.

Commits

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code labels Mar 22, 2026
@steveloughran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

is there an easy way to trigger a rerun of this? it looks a transient build problem and unrelated to jackson

@Fokko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fokko commented Mar 27, 2026

@dependabot rebase

Bumps [com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson) from 2.19.2 to 2.21.2.
- [Commits](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind
  dependency-version: 2.21.2
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-databind-2.21.2 branch from ac628d0 to 64ff3ed Compare March 27, 2026 13:46
@Fokko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fokko commented Mar 27, 2026

@steveloughran Don't we need to bump both Jackson and Jackson Databind in one go?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants