Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR implements support for passing environment variables to the process before invoking the SOPS library.
It’s conceptually similar to the following PRs:
However, in this implementation, environment variables are injected at the resource level, not globally at the provider level.
(Technically, both approaches can coexist if needed.)
Motivation
This design resolves several limitations and edge cases related to using environment variables only within the
providerblock — especially when dynamic or per-resource secret configuration is required.A detailed explanation, along with working examples, can be found here:
Testing
The examples include complete tests that demonstrate real-world usage, including dynamic variable passing and decryption behavior validation.