Bump pebble#541
Conversation
92a6df6 to
441061c
Compare
|
Ok I see the problem you need to call |
|
Ah crap - I was wondering - i didn't notice it was a separate mod. On it. |
|
My bad. I didn't run the tests for /cmd locally. |
|
You can use |
|
Yeah - sorry, our setup at work is a bit different, so I'm just figuring out the tricks in yours. Got them all passing locally now. |
|
First PR blues. |
|
Haha no worries, plus there's no documentation on how to run them so one can only guess |
|
Crazy good response time, though. Thanks so much. This unblocks me. I'm using this for a test-only implementation of something that front-ends a back-end database, so this lets me make really fast tests. I'm pumped. |
|
Keep in mind that the project is a WIP and it's taking a different direction than what's in the |
|
I'll release a patch version in a bit |
|
Awesome. Yeah - I'm only using it for a fake implementation used for unit testing, and only in-memory. If you take it in a different direction I hope you keep that use-case at least. I had this in Java/Kotlin (in-memory sql db) and it's just so handy to avoid long integration tests. |
|
Yeah the new direction is mostly for the SQL API (it will be Postgres compatible) and the on-disk file format. I'll keep the in-memory part, CI is a big use case for this library. |
No description provided.