Skip to content

🤖 fix: remove missing README screenshot#3317

Open
ibetitsmike wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mike/remove-orchestration-readme-screenshot-20260518
Open

🤖 fix: remove missing README screenshot#3317
ibetitsmike wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mike/remove-orchestration-readme-screenshot-20260518

Conversation

@ibetitsmike
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Mux is working on behalf of Mike.

Summary

Removes the missing orchestration screenshot from the README and updates the README screenshot generation skill to match the seven remaining generated assets.

Background

The README referenced docs/img/orchestrate-agents.webp, but that asset is no longer present, so the image rendered as a 404. The orchestration screenshot is no longer needed in the README screenshot workflow.

Implementation

  • Removed the orchestration screenshot table cell from README.md.
  • Updated the generate-readme-screenshots skill mapping, capture count, verification loop, and process notes to omit orchestrate-agents.webp.

Validation

  • make static-check

Risks

Low. This only removes a broken documentation image reference and updates the local screenshot-process instructions.


Generated with mux • Model: openai:gpt-5.5 • Thinking: xhigh • Cost: $2.93

Remove the README reference to the missing orchestrate-agents screenshot and update the README screenshot generation skill to describe the seven remaining generated assets.

---

_Generated with `mux` • Model: `openai:gpt-5.5` • Thinking: `xhigh` • Cost: `$2.93`_

<!-- mux-attribution: model=openai:gpt-5.5 thinking=xhigh costs=2.93 -->
@ibetitsmike
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Mux is working on behalf of Mike.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant