Skip to content

Migrate observation report to parquet and make it as blob artifact#13495

Open
xjules wants to merge 5 commits intoequinor:mainfrom
xjules:obs_report_blob
Open

Migrate observation report to parquet and make it as blob artifact#13495
xjules wants to merge 5 commits intoequinor:mainfrom
xjules:obs_report_blob

Conversation

@xjules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xjules xjules commented May 6, 2026

Issue
Resolves #13484

Approach
Ensemble storage will contain a blobs folder to contain different update related artefacts.
This migrates observation report into the blob.

(Screenshot of new behavior in GUI if applicable)

  • PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
  • Added appropriate release note label
  • Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
  • Make sure unit tests pass locally after every commit (git rebase -i main --exec 'just rapid-tests')

When applicable

  • When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
  • New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
  • Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
  • Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
  • Bug fix: Add backport label to latest release (format: 'backport release-branch-name')

@xjules xjules self-assigned this May 6, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.94%. Comparing base (d5f13f9) to head (61a35ef).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13495      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.99%   89.94%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         460      461       +1     
  Lines       32320    32392      +72     
==========================================
+ Hits        29087    29134      +47     
- Misses       3233     3258      +25     
Flag Coverage Δ
cli-tests 37.22% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
fuzz 44.08% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
gui-tests 66.88% <100.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
performance-and-unit-tests 78.06% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
test 45.62% <62.96%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/ert/analysis/_enif_update.py 96.19% <ø> (ø)
src/ert/analysis/_es_update.py 94.40% <ø> (ø)
src/ert/analysis/event.py 98.07% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ert/run_models/update_run_model.py 98.18% <100.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
src/ert/storage/blob_data.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ert/storage/local_ensemble.py 96.12% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 7, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 36 untouched benchmarks


Comparing xjules:obs_report_blob (61a35ef) with main (b4ed493)

Open in CodSpeed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Transition data: refactor observation report to ensemble blob

2 participants