Skip to content

Fix cluster-autoscaler VPA template with empty containerPolicy#9387

Open
snigdhasambitak wants to merge 2 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
snigdhasambitak:fix/vpa-template-empty-container-policy
Open

Fix cluster-autoscaler VPA template with empty containerPolicy#9387
snigdhasambitak wants to merge 2 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
snigdhasambitak:fix/vpa-template-empty-container-policy

Conversation

@snigdhasambitak
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it

Fixes the cluster-autoscaler Helm chart VPA template (templates/vpa.yaml) which renders invalid YAML when vpa.containerPolicy is set to {} (the default value).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

None found -- filing via this PR.

Bug

When vpa.enabled: true with the default containerPolicy: {}, the template on line 21:

    - containerName: {{ template "cluster-autoscaler.name" . }}
      {{- .Values.vpa.containerPolicy | toYaml | nindent 6 }}

Renders as:

    - containerName: aws-cluster-autoscaler
      {}

A flow mapping {} after an already-started block mapping key is a YAML syntax error, causing helm template to fail:

Error: YAML parse error on cluster-autoscaler/templates/vpa.yaml:
error converting YAML to JSON: yaml: line 22: did not find expected key

Fix

Wrap the containerPolicy rendering in a with block so an empty map produces no output instead of {}:

    - containerName: {{ template "cluster-autoscaler.name" . }}
      {{- with .Values.vpa.containerPolicy }}
      {{- toYaml . | nindent 6 }}
      {{- end }}

How to reproduce

helm template test cluster-autoscaler \
  --repo https://kubernetes.github.io/autoscaler \
  --version 9.56.0 \
  --set vpa.enabled=true \
  --set vpa.updateMode=Off

Verification

After the fix, both cases render valid YAML:

  • containerPolicy: {} -- renders containerName only (no extra output)
  • containerPolicy: {controlledResources: [cpu, memory]} -- renders correctly with resources listed

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Mar 19, 2026
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Mar 19, 2026

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: snigdhasambitak / name: Snigdha Sambit Aryakumar (bc58245, d6dfb0f)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: snigdhasambitak
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gjtempleton for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @snigdhasambitak!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/autoscaler 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/autoscaler has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/cluster-autoscaler needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. area/helm-charts labels Mar 19, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @snigdhasambitak. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from Shubham82 March 19, 2026 10:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Mar 19, 2026
When `vpa.containerPolicy` is set to `{}` (the default), the template
renders invalid YAML:

```yaml
    - containerName: aws-cluster-autoscaler
      {}
```

A flow mapping `{}` after a block mapping key on the previous line is
a YAML syntax error, causing `helm template` to fail with:
  "error converting YAML to JSON: yaml: line 22: did not find expected key"

Fix by wrapping the containerPolicy rendering in a `with` block so
that an empty map produces no output instead of `{}`.
@snigdhasambitak snigdhasambitak force-pushed the fix/vpa-template-empty-container-policy branch from 360f19c to d6dfb0f Compare March 19, 2026 14:35
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/cluster-autoscaler area/helm-charts cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants