Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst#149811
Merged
Merged
Conversation
In pythongh-138418, `!` was added to links to rules that don't exist in the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings. However, productionlist doesn't parse the `!`, which ends up in the rendered documentation. (It's possible that pythongh-127835 broke the `!` support.) Replace the names with ones that appear in docs: - `star_named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression` in the docs - `star_named_expressions` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression_list` in the docs - `named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `assignment_expression` in the docs Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them is tracked in (subissues of) pythongh-127833.
bedevere-app
Bot
added
docs
Documentation build overview
|
encukou
added
needs backport to 3.13
|
Thanks @encukou for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14, 3.15. |
|
GH-149836 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.15 branch. |
bedevere-app
Bot
removed
the
needs backport to 3.15
|
GH-149837 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
GH-149838 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
encukou
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…49836) Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst (GH-149811) In gh-138418, `!` was added to links to rules that don't exist in the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings. However, productionlist doesn't parse the `!`, which ends up in the rendered documentation. (It's possible that gh-127835 broke the `!` support.) Replace the names with ones that appear in docs: - `star_named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression` in the docs - `star_named_expressions` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression_list` in the docs - `named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `assignment_expression` in the docs Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them is tracked in (subissues of) gh-127833. (cherry picked from commit c375292) Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
encukou
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…49837) Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst (GH-149811) In gh-138418, `!` was added to links to rules that don't exist in the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings. However, productionlist doesn't parse the `!`, which ends up in the rendered documentation. (It's possible that gh-127835 broke the `!` support.) Replace the names with ones that appear in docs: - `star_named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression` in the docs - `star_named_expressions` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression_list` in the docs - `named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `assignment_expression` in the docs Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them is tracked in (subissues of) gh-127833. (cherry picked from commit c375292) Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
encukou
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…49838) Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst (GH-149811) In gh-138418, `!` was added to links to rules that don't exist in the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings. However, productionlist doesn't parse the `!`, which ends up in the rendered documentation. (It's possible that gh-127835 broke the `!` support.) Replace the names with ones that appear in docs: - `star_named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression` in the docs - `star_named_expressions` in the grammar corresponds to `flexible_expression_list` in the docs - `named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to `assignment_expression` in the docs Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them is tracked in (subissues of) gh-127833. (cherry picked from commit c375292) Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In gh-138418,
!was added to links to rules that don't exist in the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings. However, productionlist doesn't parse the!, which ends up in the rendered documentation. (It's possible that gh-127835 broke the!support.)Replace the names with ones that appear in docs:
star_named_expressionin the grammar corresponds toflexible_expressionin the docsstar_named_expressionsin the grammar corresponds toflexible_expression_listin the docsnamed_expressionin the grammar corresponds toassignment_expressionin the docsHaving two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them is tracked in (subissues of) gh-127833.