Skip to content

ci: add weekly markdown link check workflow#2088

Merged
mkmeral merged 2 commits intostrands-agents:mainfrom
mkmeral:ci/weekly-markdown-link-check
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

ci: add weekly markdown link check workflow#2088
mkmeral merged 2 commits intostrands-agents:mainfrom
mkmeral:ci/weekly-markdown-link-check

Conversation

@mkmeral
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mkmeral mkmeral commented Apr 7, 2026

Description

We recently had an issue where we broke URLs in the readme. This runs a weekly check and creates issue, if broken links are found.

Related Issues

#1905

Type of Change

CI

Testing

Tested in my fork

https://github.com/mkmeral/sdk-python/actions/runs/24108467001/job/70337385093


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@mkmeral mkmeral marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 23:00
@mkmeral mkmeral merged commit f58117c into strands-agents:main Apr 8, 2026
19 of 21 checks passed
@mkmeral
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mkmeral commented Apr 8, 2026

@agent-of-mkmeral create this same workflow for other repos too like sdk ts, tools, evals, etc. (docs should have its own)

@agent-of-mkmeral
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Done! Created the weekly markdown link check workflow for all 4 repos:

Repo PR Notes
sdk-typescript strands-agents/sdk-typescript#799 Same as sdk-python
tools strands-agents/tools#446 Same as sdk-python
evals strands-agents/evals#188 Same as sdk-python
docs strands-agents/docs#746 Customized: scans docs/ folder + root markdown, ignores site-internal links (/, #), localhost

All use the same pinned action (gaurav-nelson/github-action-markdown-link-check@3c3b66f...), weekly Monday 9am UTC schedule, and auto-issue creation on failure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants