[MOSH-2320]: Update API docs for worker number exposure

[jli-together]

Related to PR changes: https://github.com/togethercomputer/together-evaluation/pull/165

[github-actions]

✱ Stainless preview builds

This PR will update the togetherai SDKs with the following commit messages.

go

feat(api): add num_workers parameter to eval evaluation parameters

openapi

feat(api): add num_workers field to evaluation models

python

feat(api): add num_workers parameter to eval create parameters

terraform

chore(internal): regenerate SDK with no functional changes

typescript

feat(api): add num_workers parameter to evals model/judge requests

Edit this comment to update them. They will appear in their respective SDK's changelogs.

✅ togetherai-terraform studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

✅ togetherai-openapi studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅

✅ togetherai-typescript studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

npm install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/togetherai-typescript/9a6b70cf8bd09808c88fdb22a9966b286f05b4cd/dist.tar.gz

✅ togetherai-python studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ✅ → lint ❗ → test ⏭️

pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/togetherai-python/6d254c7f4d81a0295ce47fed275f628a7f6045f6/together-2.7.0-py3-none-any.whl

✅ togetherai-go studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

go get github.com/stainless-sdks/togetherai-go@df6f2dfbe7a3d485f46c7dcb7e0669983e431283

---

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-04-09 21:22:01 UTC

[connermanuel]

the examples are a bit weird, maybe we can just say 5